Skip to main content

Enterprise 2.0 Conference: Evening In the Cloud

Today was the first day of the Enterprise 2.0 Conference in Boston.  Unfortunately, I only have an Expo pass, so I wasn't able to attend the majority of Monday's sessions.  However, I was able to attend the Evening in the Cloud session that took place at 4:00pm.

From the description: David Berlind will open the program with a 30 minute overview of the cloud collaboration market, the major players in the market and touch on why the market is changing so rapidly.

The "major players", unfortunately, were limited to Microsoft and Google.  Rather amusing considering that the event was sponsored by IBM.  The talk was rather high-level, and the key takeaways were as follows:
  • How could an ideal cloud application improve collaboration? David began with a nice "what if" scenario in which a person just opened a word processing application and was able to save the document, share it, send it, publish it, etc. all from one spot.  He then posed the question as to whether this was best handled by a cloud solution or traditional software.
  • What are Microsoft & Google (the major players) doing? A year ago, it appeared that Microsoft and Google were headed in opposite directions.  MS was defending its installed software turf (MSOffice & Sharepoint) while Google was pushing for an exclusive cloud application solution (GApps & Gears).  Now, they're both moving toward a middle.  MS is offering a Sharepoint cloud service and has already started testing the waters with MSOffice Live.  Google has now dropped Gears (bye-bye Google offline support), has improved its MS-to-GDocs conversion, and now supports non-converted documents to be uploaded to GApps.
  • What is the cloud vs. software trend in the market? This appears to be the trend: Embrace this hybrid approach between desktop software and cloud applications.  Jive already addresses this with their MSOffice push/pull plugin.  Companies aren't yet willing to divest from their installed software solutions (for many reasons), and the cloud solutions cannot yet provide all the answers.  So, the current trend is to facilitate collaboration that spans both the desktop and cloud environments.
  • Why is the rise of activity streams important? This is perhaps the most significant shift in enterprise collaboration.  The activity stream is a powerful utility for bringing relevant information to peoples' attention.  However, many challenges yet remain for activity streams, and nobody has quite figured out how to make "the secret sauce" yet:
    • Activity streams must be easy to manage.  Too much information is noise.  If you subscribe to too many channels (spaces, people, content), you'll be overwhelmed with information.
    • Activity streams must enable work to transpire in the stream.  Links away from the stream are not necessarily a good thing.  People should just be able to get their work done from where ever they are notified of important developments.
    • Activity streams are a major component of the "Collaboration Backbone" of the enterprise.  Closed, proprietery document formats are falling out of favor.  The interplay between MSO and GDocs illustrate this.  If something is formatted properly in one medium, it should be formatted properly (and all content preserved) in another.  Information formats for content are quickly ceasing to be the "lock in" for E2.0 vendors.  Rather, it is the Activity Stream, notifications, relationships between entities, analytics, etc. that is becoming the new "lock in".  Sure, you can get all your data out of a new system.  But you can't get all of that relational/notification data out.  That is collaboration backbone, and is the secret sauce in the mix.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Social CRM: Putting Customers First

Last night I attended Social CRM: Putting Customers First , hosted by the San Francisco chapter of the Social Media Club .  It was a great event, and I'll briefly recap some of the discussion and my observations. The panelists were first asked why Social CRM (SCRM) was relevant.  Their answers were as follows: Vendors need to know who their customers are out there on the social web. Vendors need to be able to identify customer pain points from conversations on the social web.  Vendors need to know what to do with these conversations on the social web.  These discussions are the center of business today; their importance cannot be understated. The social web grows too fast for vendor solutions to keep up.  Therefore, vendor solutions must embrace the social web, and learn how to crowdsource.  There is no way that you can scale communities and community managers that fast. Customers don't care about your organization structure, they just want answers a...
1 comment
Read more

Building Better Products Using Quantitative & Qualitative Data

Disclosure: This was an internal post I wrote and shared with my colleagues back in 2015. While cleaning out my Confluence space, I came across it and thought that I'd share it with everyone. There is a much more recent and polished post by my good friend Glenn Block on Mind the Product that you can read here:  https://www.mindtheproduct.com/2018/01/need-quantitative-qualitative-data/ What Data Is/Not Data cannot  compensate for bad design or replace good design, but it can inform designers. Data cannot compensate for listening to actual users, but it can inform the kind of user research we conduct. Data cannot tell us what to build, but it can inform what we should investigate. Example If you can visualize a funnel report where visitors are leaving a buying process during various stages of the journey, quantitative data can give you information about where you may have a problem. In the above example, the quantitative data ( QT ) informs you that 36 pe...
Post a Comment
Read more

Luck Is Not The Answer

As the 2011 season of the National Football League approaches, so does the rabid anticipation of its parasitic counterpart; fantasy football. Anyone who knows me knows that I love football (not fútbol); particularly the NFL . I grew up a dedicated Patriots fan and have since become more of a fan of the game itself rather than just a New England loyalist. I tend to keep up with NFL news throughout the year, and regularly download the Rich Eisen Podcast for listening during my morning commute. Rich's guest on the most recent episode was Michael Fabiano, the resident fantasy football expert at NFL.com. At one point during the podcast, Rich and Mike were exchanging viewpoints on what constitutes being an expert and how no matter how much of an expert you are, you need to be lucky to win a fantasy league. A similar sentiment was expressed during a 2010 podcast by one of the guests (I forget whom); that it's all luck and you can't really predict anything. I take exception t...
1 comment
Read more